business

Verdict

Submitted 5/7/2026, 7:55:53 AM · Completed 5/7/2026, 1:04:55 PM

6.5
pivot
The idea

I've spent over 20 years delivering Enterprise Project Management (EPM) systems. I got tired of the reporting gaps so I built these Solution Starters

Show original source text →
After decades delivering Enterprise Project Management (EPM) and Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM) systems for global organisations, I noticed a recurring problem. Even when senior stakeholders were desperate for better visibility, the teams on the ground were still stuck with manual data and broken reporting tools. Since Power BI launched, the demand for automated PMO related and strategic reporting has grown massively, but the native experience still falls short in a lot of areas. I kept seeing the same issues where reports just don't handle project data the way an enterprise needs them to. I realised the project community really just needs a practical foundation they can build on themselves. That's why I started Freedom Solutions. I've begun releasing Solution Starters to help fix these common hurdles. For example, I just released a free Data Prep Guide and Gantt Solution Starter. I actually dug into the Microsoft open-source code to fix the milestone bug and created a custom visual that has a basic dependency line feature I needed for a Programme Status report solution starter I am currently working on. The goal is to give people the freedom to be self-sufficient and standardise their reporting. It means you can move forward without being held up by internal developer queues and expensive external consultants or waiting for official fixes that are years away. You can see what I've put together so far here: [https://freedom-solutions.co.uk](https://freedom-solutions.co.uk) I'd love to hear from others working in PMO roles, what is the one reporting hurdle that you always seem to face?
TRIZ inventive level: 3/5· Principles: parameter changes, self-service
Synthesis verdict
**Pivot**: Freedom Solutions addresses a genuine need in the enterprise project management space with its practical, self-service reporting tools built on Power BI. The focus on 'Solution Starters' like the Data Prep Guide and Gantt Solution Starter is a smart way to lower the barrier to adoption. However, the revenue model is not yet fully defined, and the dependence on Power BI's ecosystem poses a significant platform risk. To pivot, the founder should clarify the monetization strategy, including pricing tiers, conversion paths from free to paid, and unit economics. Additionally, exploring ways to mitigate platform risk, such as developing a more comprehensive and flexible solution that can adapt to changes in the Power BI ecosystem, is crucial.

Strengths

  • - Deep domain expertise in EPM and SPM
  • - Clear solution (Solution Starters) that addresses a specific, validated pain point
  • - Technical capability demonstrated through open-source code modification
  • - Clear, underserved market of enterprise PMO professionals
  • - Lean and scalable business model

Weaknesses

  • - Dependence on Power BI's ecosystem poses a significant platform risk
  • - Unclear monetization strategy
  • - Insufficient resources for scaling beyond the founder's individual capacity
  • - Potential competition from Microsoft's future updates
  • - Churn might increase if free resources aren't consistently updated

Best angle

Freedom Solutions should focus on developing a comprehensive and flexible solution that can adapt to changes in the Power BI ecosystem, while clarifying its monetization strategy to maximize value capture.

Panel verdicts

Risk

nvidia/llama-3.3-nemotron-super-49b-v1

4.0

“Dependence on Power BI's unchanged ecosystem and unclear monetization path threaten sustainability.”

Freedom Solutions faces significant threats despite addressing a genuine need. **Regulation** isn't a primary killer here, but **Platform Risk** is crucial: dependence on Power BI's ecosystem means any changes to Microsoft's strategy (e.g., filling the gaps Freedom Solutions addresses) could render the solution obsolete. **Churn** might increase if free resources aren't consistently updated or if paid solutions don't offer clear, substantial value over free alternatives. **No-budget customers**, while a target for free tools, won't drive sustainability. The most immediate killer within 6-12 months could be **Platform Risk** coupled with **Insufficient Monetization Strategy** for the free-to-paid conversion, exacerbated by potential **Microsoft Direct Competition**.

Market

qwen/qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instruct

8.0

“Enterprise PMOs don't need more software - they need self-service, battle-tested templates that bypass broken vendor tools and internal IT delays.”

There is a clear, underserved market of enterprise PMO professionals - likely 50,000-100,000 globally - who are drowning in manual reporting, broken Power BI templates, and slow IT backlogs. These are not casual users; they're budgeted roles in Fortune 500 companies, government agencies, and large-scale program offices with real KPIs tied to reporting accuracy. They're frustrated by Microsoft's generic visuals that don't handle project dependencies, milestone tracking, or portfolio roll-ups. Your Solution Starters directly address this pain: free, plug-and-play templates with fixes for known bugs (like the milestone issue) and custom visuals that save weeks of development time. The fact that you reverse-engineered Microsoft's open-source code demonstrates deep domain expertise and builds trust. The audience doesn't need another SaaS platform - they need actionable, self-service tooling they can own. Your model - free starters to build credibility, then potential premium templates, training, or enterprise customization - is lean and scalable. The unmet need isn't just better visuals; it's autonomy from IT bottlenecks. Your GitHub-style open-source approach resonates with technical PMOs who value transparency and control. The only risk is monetization clarity: if everything stays free, growth stalls. But with tiered offerings (e.g., advanced templates, compliance packs, or certified integrations), this could become a $5M+ niche business. The market is real, the pain is acute, and your solution is technically superior to anything Microsoft offers out-of-the-box.

Competition

no model

This agent failed to return a verdict (executor exception: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'strip'). The synthesis ran with the remaining agents.

Monetization

mistralai/mistral-nemotron(fallback #1)

7.0

“The idea has strong potential but needs a clearer monetization strategy to scale effectively.”

Freedom Solutions addresses a clear pain point in the enterprise project management space by offering practical, self-service reporting tools built on Power BI. The focus on 'Solution Starters' like the Data Prep Guide and Gantt Solution Starter is a smart way to lower the barrier to adoption, especially with a free offering to attract users. The monetization potential lies in upselling premium templates, custom visuals, or consulting services for more complex implementations. However, the revenue model is not yet fully defined - pricing tiers, conversion paths from free to paid, and unit economics (e.g., cost per user, margins on premium offerings) need to be clarified. The niche is well-defined, but the business model could be more concrete to maximize value capture.

Viability

nvidia/llama-3.3-nemotron-super-49b-v1(fallback #1)

8.0

“A 2-person team can deliver targeted Solution Starters within the timeframe, but scaling the overall platform or broad adoption may require additional resources.”

The idea leverages the founder's deep domain expertise in EPM and SPM, addressing a specific, validated pain point with a clear solution (Solution Starters) that has already seen initial development (e.g., Data Prep Guide, Gantt Solution Starter). The open-source code modification demonstrates technical capability. Challenges include scaling beyond the founder's individual capacity, competing with Microsoft's potential future updates, and ensuring broad adoption beyond the founder's network. The 2-person team can likely deliver v1 within 4-12 weeks for each Solution Starter, given the focused scope, but growing the platform or adding multiple starters simultaneously may strain resources. Technical complexity is moderate due to the Power BI ecosystem's familiarity but requires nuanced understanding of enterprise PMO needs.

Synthesized by meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct · 19.6s