business

Verdict

Submitted 5/28/2026, 9:41:05 AM · Completed 5/28/2026, 9:42:58 AM

5.8
pivot
The idea

Advice on how to set up a dynamic calculator

Pain point
The user needs a dynamic calculator that integrates variable pricing with historical price comparisons and adders to determine the lowest delivered cost for milk products.
Who has this problem
Excel users managing complex pricing structures for dairy products
Contradiction (TRIZ)
The user wants to dynamically select the lowest price from the last four weeks but is limited by the need to manually manage multiple tabs and formulas.
Ideal final result
A fully automated system that dynamically selects the lowest price from the last four weeks, applies adders, and calculates the final delivered cost without manual intervention.
Suggested solution
Implement a combination of dynamic array functions like FILTER and MIN with XLOOKUP to automatically reference the last four price tabs, compare values, and select the minimum. Use named ranges for adders to ensure consistency. Create a macro to automate tab creation and data consolidation for historical price comparisons.
Show original source text →
Let's say I need to price a bunch of milk. I have a set of variables like type (skim, 1%, 2%, whole), carton size (single serve, half gallon, gallon), dairy farm (private label, prairie farms, fairlife), and flavor (plain, chocolate, strawberry). I also have freight costs for dairy-to-customer delivery. Individual variables have an adder attached to them that needs to be accounted for when getting my final delivered cost. I know I should probably use a system of dropdowns and xlookup for this, but I have another element of variables: I need to be able to look at the last 4 weeks of milk prices at the time of shipment and choose whichever price is lowest. I also different base prices depending on the dairy and milk type, like this: ||BRAND 1|BRAND 2|BRAND 3| |:-|:-|:-|:-| |SKIM|$1.50 | $2.00 | $1.75 | |1%|$1.62 | $2.50 | $2.00 | |2%|$1.75 | $3.00 | $2.25 | |WHOLE|$2.00 | $3.25 | $3.15 | I need the sheet to be able to find which base price it needs to use (while looking at the last 4 weeks' prices) and then add the correct adders to get my final price. I already have a system set up to grab the last week's prices and name a new tab after it after the day it was captured, and I'm trying to work on a macro that creates a function that will compare a certain cell over the last 4 tabs created and choose the lowest number. I just don't know how to marry all this together and get it working. Adders aren't dynamic, they stay the same no matter what other variables are chosen (a 1% +$0.25 adder is the same no matter if I'm pricing a half gallon or full gallon). I would be very thankful for any advice!!!
TRIZ inventive level: 3/5· Principles: dynamicity, parameter changes
Synthesis verdict
**Pivot**: The idea of creating a pricing tool for dairy products has potential, but it requires significant development to become a viable business venture. The concept addresses a clear operational pain point for dairy distributors or retailers, and the market opportunity is substantial. However, the differentiation is limited, and the value proposition is non-defensible, making the venture low-durability. To pivot, the focus should be on evolving the spreadsheet macro into a subscription-based pricing platform with clear tiered pricing, integration capabilities, and value-added analytics.

Strengths

  • - Addresses a clear operational pain point for dairy distributors or retailers
  • - Substantial market opportunity in the U.S. dairy market
  • - Potential for significant cost savings for bulk dairy buyers
  • - Clear value proposition in automating price selection based on the lowest price from the last four weeks
  • - Feasible development timeframe for a team with strong Excel/VBA skills

Weaknesses

  • - Limited differentiation and non-defensible value proposition
  • - Easily replicable by competitors using existing tools
  • - Over-reliance on fragile, manually updated Excel macros and static adders
  • - High platform risk and churn due to Excel's limitations and user frustration
  • - Lack of clear upsell opportunities and modest monetization potential

Best angle

Evolve the spreadsheet macro into a subscription-based pricing platform with integration capabilities and value-added analytics to become a viable business venture.

Panel verdicts

Competition

nvidia/nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b-reasoning

4.0

“The differentiation is limited to a custom Excel - style macro that can be replicated with existing spreadsheet tools, making the value proposition non - defensible and the venture low - durability.”

The concept addresses a specific, niche pricing need for dairy products, combining variable adder calculations with dynamic selection of the lowest historical price from the past four weeks. While the idea integrates several functional layers - dropdown selection, lookup tables, macro-driven price comparison - these components are all implementable using existing tools such as Excel, Google Sheets, or low - code SaaS platforms. Competitors such as specialized ERP modules for food - service pricing, generic spreadsheet templates, and custom pricing SaaS already offer similar flexibility, albeit without the exact macro - driven historical price comparison. Because the differentiation relies on a bespoke macro implementation rather than a unique algorithm or proprietary data source, it is easily replicated and lacks a durable competitive moat. The market for a dedicated milk - pricing calculator is small, and customers can achieve comparable functionality in-house, reducing the viability of a standalone business venture.

Risk

nvidia/llama-3.3-nemotron-super-49b-v1

4.0

“Over-reliance on fragile, manually updated Excel macros and static adders threatens long-term viability.”

The proposed system's complexity, reliance on manual macro updates, and static adder limitations pose significant risks. The macro's ability to dynamically compare prices across the last four tabs is error-prone and scalable only with substantial VBA expertise. Regulatory risks are low in this context, but platform risk (Excel's limitations) and churn (user frustration) are high. Customers with no budget for potential consulting or employee training to maintain this system could abandon it.

Viability

nvidia/llama-3.3-nemotron-super-49b-v1(fallback #1)

8.0

“Feasible within the given timeframe for a team with strong Excel/VBA skills due to the project's contained scope.”

The idea's technical complexity is moderate due to the interplay of multiple variables and historical price comparison. Building v1 is feasible for a solo/2-person team within 4-12 weeks, assuming proficiency in Excel/VBA. Challenges include dynamically linking variables across sheets and reliably executing the macro for lowest price identification across the last four weeks' data. The adder system is straightforward. Success hinges on effective data structuring and VBA scripting for the price comparison function. Given the contained scope (focused on a specific pricing model without external integrations), the timeline seems realistic with dedicated effort.

Market

mistralai/mistral-small-4-119b-2603(fallback #2)

7.0

“The real market opportunity lies in automating cost optimization for bulk dairy buyers, where even small price variances compound into significant savings, justifying a paid tool for mid-to-large distributors or retailers.”

The proposed business venture addresses a clear operational pain point for dairy distributors or retailers: dynamic pricing based on multiple variables (brand, milk type, size, flavor) while incorporating historical price data to optimize costs. The core value proposition - automating price selection based on the lowest price from the last four weeks - is compelling for businesses with thin margins, such as grocery chains, convenience stores, or institutional buyers (e.g., schools, hospitals) that purchase milk in bulk. These entities have real budgets and would benefit from cost-saving automation, especially if they operate in competitive markets where price fluctuations are frequent. The audience size is substantial: the U.S. dairy market alone is worth ~$60B annually, with milk accounting for a significant portion. Even a 1% cost saving on bulk purchases could translate to millions in annual savings for a mid-sized distributor or retailer. The willingness to pay for such a tool is high, as it directly impacts profitability. The technical challenge - marrying historical price data with variable adders - is solvable with Excel/VBA or a lightweight web app, but the complexity may require professional development resources, which could be a barrier for smaller players. However, the ROI for mid-to-large distributors or retailers would justify the investment. The key risk is ensuring the tool integrates seamlessly with existing inventory or ERP systems, as manual data entry would undermine its utility. Additionally, the adder system must remain static to avoid overcomplicating the model, which the proposer has already accounted for. The venture's scalability depends on whether the tool can be generalized to other perishable goods or if it remains niche to dairy.

Monetization

openai/gpt-oss-120b(fallback #2)

6.0

“To become a viable business, the spreadsheet macro must evolve into a subscription - based pricing platform with clear tiered pricing, integration capabilities, and value - added analytics.”

The concept is a niche pricing automation tool for dairy distributors that aggregates recent price data, applies static adders, and outputs a delivered cost. Its value proposition is clear: reduce manual spreadsheet work, improve price accuracy, and speed up quoting. However, the revenue model is under - defined. A viable path would be a subscription SaaS aimed at small - to - mid - size dairy distributors, priced $49 - $199 per month depending on the number of SKUs and data integrations. Channels could include direct sales via industry trade shows, partnerships with dairy ERP vendors, and inbound marketing (content on pricing optimization). Gross margin for a cloud - based tool is typically 80-90% after covering hosting, support, and development costs; the main cost - to - serve is customer support and ongoing data - feed maintenance. The unit economics hinge on low churn (annual contracts) and a modest CAC (e.g., $500 - $1,000) given the narrow market. The idea lacks differentiation beyond a spreadsheet macro; competitors could offer more advanced AI - driven demand forecasting or integrate directly with ERP systems. Without a clear upsell (e.g., analytics dashboards, API access) the pricing tier may be too low to sustain product development. Overall, the concept has a modest monetization potential if expanded into a full - featured pricing engine, but as described it is more of an internal tool than a scalable revenue stream.

Synthesized by meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct · 11.6s